ESMA has today published a consultation paper requesting responses to a proposal which seeks to provide additional time for market participants with limited volume to comply with the clearing mandate under EMIR. If approved, the proposal would delay the compliance date for Category 3 entities by two years. Category 3 comprises FCs and NFC + AIFs […]

ESMA`s latest consultation on indirect clearing arrangements under EMIR and MiFIR closed on 17 December 2015. The absence of consensus on the majority of issues is evidenced by the large number of disparate responses received from participants up and down the clearing chain. In particular, a stark criticism is that the twin RTS on indirect […]

Background EMIR introduced a clearing obligation in relation to “OTC derivative contracts” of any class that has been declared subject to a clearing obligation and which are transacted between particular types of counterparty[1].  MiFIR[2] extended the scope of the clearing obligation to all derivative transactions concluded on a regulated market.  There are three basic ways […]

The Financial Markets Law Committee (FMLC) has published a paper detailing its concerns over the Article 30(2) MiFIR indirect clearing mandate. Article 30 MiFIR allows access to a CCP by a “client of a client of a clearing member” (indirect client). While the RTS still languishes in draft form, pending possible adjustments to the EMIR […]